Congressional appropriations committees offered a near-total rebuke of President Trump’s proposed downsizing and reshaping of ...
A federal court ruled against Trump's planned cuts to NIH funding, aimed at limiting indirect cost coverage for universities. The decision supports several Democratic states and major educational ...
BOSTON, Jan 5 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Monday ruled U.S. President Donald Trump's administration cannot carry out steep cuts to federal grant funding provided by the National ...
A federal appeals court in Boston heard arguments Tuesday as the Trump administration seeks to overturn a ruling that found the NIH acted unlawfully in terminating research grants.
Overall, the decision is a clear win for research universities, with the threat of these funding cuts seeming increasingly remote. There are plenty of other ways that scientific funding is under ...
21 other states joined the State Department of Justice in suing the Trump Administration to block the cuts from taking effect.
Today’s victory sends a clear message that the Trump Administration cannot sacrifice the health of our residents for its own ...
The ruling means the NIH will continue to pay indirect cost rates, which fund labs, infrastructure and utilities.
A series of graphics reveals how the Trump administration has sought historic cuts to science and the research workforce.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta today issued the following statement. “The Trump Administration wanted to eviscerate funding for medical research that helps develop new cures and treatments for ...
The outlook has brightened for federal science budgets, but political appointees are likely to have a big say in how that ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback