Members of the media set up outside the U.S. Supreme Court as the justices hear arguments on former President Trump’s claim of presidential immunity over criminal charges over his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results in Washington,
CNN legal analyst Steve Vladeck writes that the fate of the January 6 prosecution likely rests in the hands of the Supreme Court justice who did the least to reveal his views in Thursday’s oral arguments: Chief Justice John Roberts.
Brescia said the Supreme Court may simply rule that Trump has immunity from prosecution. "It's quite possible that they rule outright that the immunity claims are legitimate, and
Did the American Revolution actually happen? If it did, was it a good thing? This is more or less what Justice Elena Kagan seemed to be wondering during the oral arguments in Donald Trump’s Jan. 6 immunity case at the Supreme Court on Thursday morning.
The former president, who lamented not attending arguments in Washington as he is on trial in New York in a separate criminal trial, in which he has pleaded not guilty, was represented by attorney John Sauer.
The Supreme Court seems likely to reject Donald Trump’s immunity claim. More than 500 people have been arrested at college protests in the past week. One of Harvey Weinstein’s rape convictions was overturned yesterday.
At Trump's Supreme Court immunity hearing, a majority of justices clearly didn’t buy the full sweep of his assertion of executive power -- but that may not matter much
CNN’S Paula Reid reports on the U.S. Supreme Court hearing arguments on Donald Trump’s immunity claims. Trump campaign accused of breaking federal law by hiding millions in legal payments A Ukraine-born congresswoman voted no on aid.
The US Supreme Court suggested it might drag out Donald Trump’s claim of immunity from prosecution, an outcome that could doom any chance of a pre-election trial on charges of trying to stay in power illegally.
The Supreme Court heard a historic case on whether Trump has immunity or can be criminally prosecuted over his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss
In today’s edition, reporters Lawrence Hurley and Ryan J. Reilly break down what happened in the Supreme Court arguments over Trump's claim of absolute immunity
Supreme Court justices' questions during oral argument on Donald Trump's claim that he is immune from criminal acts indicate that they see that giving dictator-like powers to U.S. presidents is dangerous.
The Supreme Court's conservative justices signaled support on Thursday for U.S. presidents having some level of protection from criminal charges for certain acts taken in office as it tackled Donald Trump's claim of immunity from prosecution for trying to undo his 2020 election loss.
Heading into Thursday’s oral arguments, many legal pundits had predicted the justices would swat away Trump’s claim of immunity from federal criminal charges for trying to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
There was talk of drone strikes and presidential bribes, of a potential ruling “for the ages” and of the Founding Fathers, too. The presidential race went unmentioned but was not far from mind. The Supreme Court heard more than 2 1/2 hours worth of arguments on the landmark question of whether former President Donald Trump is immune from prosecution in a case charging him with plotting to overturn the 2020
Conservative and liberal justices grappled with the historic significance of the case, which will impact presidential power and Donald Trump’s D.C. trial.
Conservative justices seemed focused on preventing runaway prosecutions of future presidents. Liberals worried about lawless kings. And other key takeaways.
The Supreme Court convened to consider whether former President Donald Trump is entitled to broad immunity from criminal charges in the 2020 election case.
The Supreme Court on Thursday appeared likely to reject former President Donald Trump’s claim of absolute immunity from prosecution over election interference, but several justices signaled reservations about the charges that could cause a lengthy delay,
While the Supreme Court Justices seemed skeptical that Donald Trump has total immunity, several conservative justices indicated an openness to kicking the case back down to the lower courts. Marcus Childress and Ankush Khardori join The Weekend to unpack it all.
Thursday’s Supreme Court hearing was memorable for its discussion of coups, assassinations and internments — but very little about Donald Trump’s conduct.
In arguments about Presidential immunity, the conservative Justices, who avoided mentioning Trump, made clear that they are less concerned with holding him accountable than with shielding former Presidents from retribution.
In arguments on Thursday, the justices appeared to signal two ways they could help Donald Trump as he fights charges that he plotted to overturn the 2020 election.
The Supreme Court on presidential immunity. A president has to have immunity. If you don’t have immunity you just have a ceremonial president” That was former president Donald Trump outside the Manhattan courtroom where his criminal hush money trial is taking place.
Trump attorney Will Scharf joined 'America's Newsroom' to discuss the state of Trump's immunity case before the Supreme Court as his legal woes hinder his ability to campaign.
During nearly three hours of historic Supreme Court arguments, John Roberts said little. But the cagey chief justice made some points abundantly clear.
Criminal defense attorney Lexie Rigden joined 'Fox & Friends First' to discuss her key takeaways from Trump's immunity case before the Supreme Court and the latest on Trump's criminal trial in Manhattan.
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in former president Trump's immunity claim. While they will ultimately decide whether or not former President Trump can be tried for plotting to overturn the 2020 election,
Former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy provides legal analysis on the Supreme Court weighing former President Trump’s immunity claims on 'The Bottom Line.'
MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell details how the arguments by the Supreme Court on Trump’s immunity claim reveals the two different kinds of justices on the court, “justices who are trying to protect the Constitution and the law” and justices who are trying to protect “specifically a former president named Trump.
An MSNBC prime time panel share overall assessments of the arguments presented to the Supreme Court today on the question of whether "presidential immunity" protects Donald Trump from being prosecuted for his role in the January 6 insurrection,
Presidents deserving some form of immunity is an argument that conservative Supreme Court Justices are apparently open to, as revealed by Donald Trump’s immunity claim Supreme Court arguments. Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) slams the Republican justices who seem to support this argument.
Former federal prosecutor Francey Hakes and former congressional investigator Sam Dewey react to the Supreme Court's hearing on former President Trump's presidential immunity claim on 'The Evening Edit.