Republican leaders counter that lawfully partisan — and not racial — considerations helped inform their decision-making.

North Carolina’s Republican-crafted electoral maps are headed to trial this week as opponents contend they illegally ...

The Supreme Court will release a flurry of decisions as it wraps up its term, with rulings on gender-affirming care, ...

The state's current congressional lines were drawn by Democratic Gov. Tony Evers. The state Supreme Court approved his set of maps in 2022 because it made the least changes compared to ones ...

The U.S. Supreme Court will determine whether the new map will be officially implemented. The U.S. Supreme Court is weighing whether to uphold Louisiana’s congressional map, which was used in ...

South Carolina ... state’s congressional map saying it was an illegally gerrymandered on racial basis. However, the state argued it was a partisan gerrymander. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld ...

On May 23, the Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 split along ideological lines that the electoral maps drawn by South ... The case concerned South Carolina’s Congressional First district, which ...

The nation’s highest court issued a 6-to-3 ... In early 2022 at the State House, the South Carolina legislature approved the state’s new Congressional map, capping off the redistricting ...

The nation’s highest court issued a 6-3 decision Thursday ... In early 2022 at the State House, the South Carolina legislature approved the state’s new Congressional map, capping off the redistricting ...

Back in the U.S., the Supreme Court on Thursday approved a South Carolina congressional map that a lower court previously ruled was racially gerrymandered and constituted a “bleaching of African ...

South Carolina State Conference ... County [were moved out of] Congressional District No. 1.” Justice Alito in Alexander held that the plaintiff did not meet this standard. Despite the “tens of ...