Prince Harry's attorney argued against the 2020 decision to strip Harry of taxpayer-funded police security when he visits Britain

The Home Office said RAVEC had considered the "likely significant public upset" that would stem from something happening to Prince Harry and was aware of the "tragic death" of his mother, Princess Diana, who died in a car accident in 1997 after her vehicle was pursued by paparazzi.

Prince Harry's lawyers are to demand his taxpayer-funded protection is restored as they claim it was unfair to remove police help.

LONDON (Reuters) - Prince Harry has been subjected to "unlawful and unfair treatment" by the British government over the decision to take away his police protection when he is in Britain, his lawyer told London's High Court on Tuesday.

Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, is challenging the U.K. government's decision to provide him with less police protection when he comes back for visits. The government decided to deny the duke the highest level of state-funded protection after he and his wife Meghan,

This case is about the right to safety and security of a person. There could not be a right of greater importance to any of us,” Harry’s barrister Shaheed Fatima said Tuesday.

Prince Harry took his fight with Britain's Home Office over his security to the country's High Court on Tuesday, where he argued that he has been treated unfairly and put him possibly in danger.

Prince Harry has made a High Court challenge against the Home Office over his security protection when visiting the UK. He wants to overturn a ruling that saw his security status downgraded after he stopped being a "working royal".

The Heritage Foundation wants Joe Biden's administration to say whether Prince Harry disclosed drugs use on visa forms.

SHAMEFUL MILESTONE’ TRAGEDY LIGHTS OUT NOTHING BURGER FINITE RESOURCES Prince Harry’s lawyers argued in court Tuesday that the government was wrong to strip him of automatic police protection when visiting the U.