The Trump administration is cutting billions of dollars in biomedical ... do not need the added federal funding. The NIH policy, essentially a massive budget cut to science and medical centers ...

The National Institutes of Health will no longer be funding work on the health effects of climate change, according to ...

Studies on climate change and South Africa are also on the latest list of grants to be terminated, according to updated ...

Former NIH director Dr. Harold Varmus speaks out about what recent budget cuts and policy changes could mean for science.

A new report reveals the substantial economic impact of NIH grants on Illinois, with billions in funding at stake.

Some conservative lawmakers are quietly urging the president to restore research funding as cuts threaten academic ...

The NIH, the main funder of biomedical research, awarded about $35 billion in grants to research groups last year. The total is divided into “direct” costs – covering researchers’ salaries and ...

The Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC) at the University of Pittsburgh is one of the country’s hubs for researchers ...

Alabama senators help crank Trump’s chainsaw What are NIH ‘indirect costs’ and why should you care if funding is cut ... funder of biomedical research, awarded about $35 billion in grants ...

The National Institutes of Health (NIH), the main federal agency for medical research, provides about $8 billion ... public funding for biomedical research is under attack. Earlier this month the ...

STEIN: This is a huge case for biomedical ... billions of dollars cut from their budget. Altogether, that would be just an enormous blow to U.S. science. FLORIDO: Rob, back to the NIH.